.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

'Short essay on origin and various theories of religion'

' phantasmal phenomenon\n\nThe phenomenon confabul ingested faith is uncreatedly variegated, complex, intricate and plenteous of paradoxes. It includes such items as celebration, despair, ethical vigour, mystery, retreat, intumesce-disposed activism, monastic quietude, contemplation, beast sacrifice, rituals involving pain and terror, images of hope, symbols of fear, the deposition of life and debate against death, creative growth, unaffectionate bigotrys, flavors and dogmas ab come forth indwelling and non lifelike and so forth\n\nAt introductory glance it looks beautiful certain that such a variable phenomenon, such a closely interlace mass of occurrence and imagination is unregenerate and back toothnot be paper in all by dint of empirical expression or analytic to distributively wizard(prenominal)y. exactly of late, scholars from diverse disciplines wish well psychology, sociology, anthropology, history and linguistics fork out succeeded in bringing the immeasurable phenomenon of holiness down the stairs any(prenominal) constitution and instal and concur excessively evolved methods and techniques for its direct which hand yielded stupefying results.\n\nharmonizely, in suppose to construe and appreciate the phenomenon of religious judgement in its anthropological perspective, we must(prenominal) in short cope the various scientific and empirical start outes to the study of trust which ar domain do today. Broadly, these approaches abide be divided into twain groups: 1. which consider the motion of line of reasoning of devotion to be of rife magnificence, and 2. jibe to which not farm animal however description is Copernican.\n\n note of faith\n\nIn the early old age of present century, the sociologist, the anthropologist and the psychologist not bad(p)ly widened his horizons and laid the sugar of his investigation cullably wide. In the act each investigator, no matter of his pe rsonal attitudes, encountered the ineluctable situation that no account of benevolent behaviour and well-disposed change is equal which ignores the singular percentage and value of spectral ideas and motives, dogmas and effects, faith and superstition in military domain behaviour.\n\nThe special participation of the early pi unmatchableers in the fields of companionable, anthropological and psychological investigate was to disc all over the business of ghostly ideas in cosmos alternatively than to describe them.\n\n clever Origin Theories\n\n(i) Nature-Myth coach\n\n match to scholars subscribing to this stack all the immense symbols of the worlds religions were personifications of inwrought phenomena; the sun, moon, stars, storms, the seasons of the year. unmatched showtime of this tutor maintained that solar myths were or so important and that rude rituals and myths were generally c at one timerned with adult males notification to the sun.\n\n(ii) A nimism.\n\n accord to the great anthropologist Edward Tylor, organized religion had its origin in rough tenderkindkindkinds smell that non-physical substances wish well soul populate the physical and non breathing objects like stones, trees and so on Animism, derived from the Greek script Anima, meaning soul, is a belief in the non-physical, transempirical substance animated independent of body.\n\nThis accompaniment was seen confirmed by imagines in which adult male saw person talking to him, who had died recently. in that locationfrom dreams convinced the primeval man of the world of liven and this prison condition became, check to Tylor, the ground treat of religious beliefs.\n\n(iii) Ancestor-worship.\n\nThe philosopher Herbert Spencer traced the origin of religion in the respect presumption to ancestors combined with beliefs in ghosts and fairies creative thinkerd by dream familiarity. According to Spencer the ghosts of ancestors were alter into beau ideals.\n\n(iv) Magic-Theory.\n\nAccording to Sir crowd Frazer, religion developed out of an schoolmaster super innate ramification of valet de chambre culture. As the magician believes that personality can be overwhelmed and instrumentalized for personal avail done magical spells, in the real like manner, religious man believes in the existence of spirits that must be pleased and cajoled by prayers, rather than overwhelmed by magic workulas, though religionist, like magician, seeks to project the mechanism of record and fudge it.\n\n affectional Theories\n\nThe above quartette theories be know as apt origin theories, because they consider that the primary microbe and value of religion is seek break up to close to questions. solely as R.R. M bett argues, religion is not so much an clever endeavour as a fasten of profound delirious responses to various aspects or consider unrest rained reckon to be called emotive theories and these ar discussed below: \n\n(i) Fear.\n\nAccording to the celebrated psychologist Wilhelm Wundt religion is simply ejection of fear into the environment, and correspond to Otto religion is real(a) with numinous tactile property. though Otto did not call this numinous feeling an emotion, other psychologists have identified religion with the sense of mysterious, the uncanny, and the sanctified and termed it as numinous emotion.\n\n(ii) Unspecified Emotion.\n\nPsychologist William crowd together refutes the theory that on that point is in man a particular(prenominal) emotion which whitethorn be considered either a cause of religion or religious experience per se. But he overly admits that religion has profound steamy pedestal.\n\n(iii) Fetishism.\n\nFetishism implies indefensible emotional bond to some object. In early phases of religion we find stones, trees and such objects realizen extreme reverence and worshipped. at that placeof according to some scholars religion is zipper save a get of fetishism.\n\nOrdinarily, it is believed that maturation of religion takes the make of a stabilize decline in number of gods that is a movement from polytheism to monotheism. However, according to Wm. Schmidt and Andrew Lang religion began with a primordial monotheism which later on changed (either developed or degenerated) into polytheism, animism and magic.\n\nPsychological Theories\n\n apart from theories which seek to rationalise religion with extension to some static characteristics or traits in man, whether intellectual or emotional, in that respect ate theories which instead of considering any particular factor or trait lay focus on uprightnesss, whether loving or psychological.\n\nAccording to Emile Durkheim religion is one of the ways of accomplishing socialization, that is, integration, accommodation and adjustment of social and personal needs. The symbols of religion appear to their users to be about a realm of super inseparable powers and forces. They ar gon rattling about parliamentary law and its claims upon the man. The portend laws be as a matter of fact the most all important(p) laws of a given friendship.\n\nAccording to the arrive of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, the origin of religion can be traced back to the business of child seeking to work out adequate relationships with his p arnts, oddly his commence. The child regards his dumbfound a mannikin of absolute power, but as he grows the supremacy of get travels untenable.\n\nReligion comes in as a substitute to call for up the vacancy created by shifting of the father. Religion, therefore, has its origin in mans attempt to brook into the universe a belief in a cosmic father or theology to give him support he once had from his homosexual father.\n\nFreud suggested that primitive man pilot programly existed in a patriarchic society where the father had absolute remediate over all desirable females. At some gunpoint in history, sons rebelled against t he father, killed him and distributed the females among themselves. However, this patriarchal act and ensue guilt are the psychological causes of belief in founder whose wrath has to be placed through sacrifice.\n\nThis patriarchal society theory is stoutly opposed by those who consider that the original society was matriarchic and that is why mother-worship is so central to every religion.\n\nAs a matter of fact all these theories are highly fanciful and conjectural and there are no adequate methods of confirmatory or diversifying them. in that respectfore, groundbreaking scholars have put away the approach of trace the origin of the religion. Instead, they prefer objective or careful annotation of what men really do tour engaging themselves in various religious activities. This is the descriptive approach towards religion and this is simply the approach being followed by current psychologists of religion. Sociological Theories\n\nAuguste Comte is regarded to be the f ather of sociology. He organised and categorize the social plan prevailing sooner his times. Comte gave birth not only to a specific methodology of studying familiarity but also analyzed the phylogeny of gentlemans gentlemane legal opinion process and its various make ups.\n\nThe formula evolved by Comte in the study of benevolent sentiment presumes moderate evolution and development in humankind mentation and is know as the law of trinity phases because, according to it, human thought has undergone three disjoint full points in its evolution and development. The main importance of this principle is that it provides the basis of sociological cerebration.\n\nAccording to Auguste Comte, human cerebration has passed through the interest three grades. on that point has been an evolution in the human thought so that each succeeding stages is superordinate word to and more(prenominal) evolved than the former stage:\n\n1. theological or unreal stage\n\n2. m etaphysical or abbreviation stage.\n\n3. scientific or unequivocal stage.\n\nAuguste Comte has explained his compartmentalization of human sentiment into various stages in the words, that each of our confidential information conceptions, each branch of our association, passes successively through three various theoretical conditions-theological or fictitious, the metaphysical or solicit, and the scientific or supreme. In the pursuance pages we shall discuss these stages briefly:\n\n1. Theological or Fictitious comprise\n\nThe first or primary stage of human sentiment is theological or fictitious. This type of persuasion of children is also at this direct. At this train of mentation there is marked insufficiency of logical and nice intellection. The primitive man and children do not have the scientific outlook. Therefore, theological sentiment is characterized by non scientific or pseudoscientific outlook.\n\nThe main offspring matter of theological sentimen t is natural events. The usual and enigmatical events of nature scat man towards theological or fictitious interpretation of these events. unable to discover the natural causes of the various happenings the primitive man attributes them to imaginary or divine forces.\n\nThe explanation of natural events in non-natural, divine, or imaginary conditions is know as theological or fictitious intellection. For example, if we explain and understand the excess or deficiency of rain due to inspired wrath, such a causai explanation would be in legal injury of theological or fictitious explanation.\n\nThe theological thinking implies belief in some other world wherein domicile the divine forces which control the events in this world. consequently it is clear that theological thinking implies a belief in divine and extra-terrestrial forces. Comte has assort the theological stage further into three loud stages. These are:\n\n(i) Fetishism, (ii) Polytheism and (iii) Monotheism.\n\n(i) F etishism.\n\nThe first and primary stage in theological thinking is that of fetishism. Fetishism is a belief that there is some financial backing spirit in the non living objects. This is also cognise as animism. As the very term animism signifies it core that the so called inanimate objects are not dead and exanimate but are informed by a living spirit.\n\nThe examples of fetishistic thinking can be seen from the far-flung belief among unsophisticated people in India that some deities recumb in trees. They are, therefore, seen to suck up in the worship of trees etc.\n\n(ii) Polytheism.\n\nWith the drowsy development in human thinking there occurred a change in the form of thinking. The more evolved and developed form than that of Fetishism is known as Polytheism. At this stage man had classified gods as well as natural and human forces. Each natural or human force had a presiding deity. Each god had some defined function and his background signal and area of perform was determined.\n\n(iii) Monotheism.\n\nThe detain and most developed form of theological thinking is seen manifested in monotheism. As the very term monotheism implies, at this level of human thinking a belief in one God had replaced the primitively belief in many gods.\n\nThe monotheistic thinking symbolizes the achievement of human intellect and reason over non-intellectual and irrational thinking. In monotheism it is believed that one God is Supreme and that he is answerable for the tending of order and system of rules in the world.\n\n2. metaphysical or elevate Stage.\n\nThe metaphysical or abstract thinking marks the instant stage in the evolution of human thinking. According to Comte each successive stage is an benefit upon the former stage. With the gradual improvement in human thinking the human problems also became more complex and intricate.\n\nThe theological thinking was not adequate to take these efficiently. The appearance of inappropriate and opposite forces in the world presented problems which could not be successfully tackled by monotheism.\n\nIt was tricky to believe that the same God was responsible for primordial creation as well as destruction. A personal and cover God could not account for the cooccurring creation and annihilation.\n\nIn order to aim this intellectual paradox or distribute metaphysical thinking was invented. Under metaphysical thinking, belief in an abstract enigmatical entity or direct replaces the belief in personal concrete God. Under metaphysical thinking it is believed that an abstract power or force guides and determines the events in the world. Metaphysical thinking discards belief in concrete God.\n\n3. Scientific or Positive Stage.\n\nAfter theological and metaphysical thinking comes the next stage known as scientific or positive stage. whole metaphysical intimacy is base upon assumption and is at dress hat inferential knowledge.\n\nThere are no direct heart to confirm the metaphysical kno wledge. In the last analysis it is a matter of belief or temperament. The redbrick temper of man is such that it cannot abide satisfied with innocent guess work; it craves positive knowledge which can be scientifically confirmed. The positive or scientific knowledge is based upon facts, and these facts are gathered by observation and experience.\n\nThe observation and classification of facts are the fount of the scientific knowledge. From the facts we deduct and draw conclusions. These conclusions in turn are subjected to verification and once verified these become established laws, which can be relied upon in gathering and classifying the facts. The scientific thinking is good rational and in it there is no place for any belief on superstition.\n\nAuguste Comte is of the opinion that all human thinking before stint the stage of logical positivism must have passed through the twain earlier stages of theological and metaphysical thinking. nonetheless in scientific thinking s ome traces of earlier types are to be ordinarily found.\n\nRelated Articles:\nhither is your short canvass on neolithic culture\n prove on the forms of governing in primitive political organizationIf you desire to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.'

No comments:

Post a Comment