Historical biases and how the truth was altered Essay

Taking into account the temper of historical truth, it cannot be viewed from absolutist position, but rather from relativist perspective. The values, dictated by the true epoch, determine the purpose and the context of history, so there is a number of historical biases (again, from advanced(a) viewpoint) in the writings, describing and explaining the past experiences. The paper is knowing to focus on the main historical biases and highlight the influence of juvenile media on the construction of new biases.Due to the fact that there is a plenty of historiographic schools, one can presume that each of them chooses specific symbolism or aspect as a baseline and develops its argument through with(predicate) certain prism. In this sense, the book by Edwars Said, Orientalism, to great extent emphasizes the faultiness of Western historiographic approach to the diametrically opposite culture.The scholar writes The Orient is not only adjacent to Europe it is also the place of Europes g reatest and richest and oldest colonies, the source of its civilizations and languages, its cultural contestant, and one of its deepest and most recurring images of the former(a) (Said, 1979, pp. 1-2). Orientalism whence comprises the historically biased attitude towards the cultural otherness, so the author concludes that eastern studies cannot be completely independent from the polarization and coming upon between the two civilizations.Further to a greater extent, social stratification determined the status of certain individual in society and consequently resulted in the creation of essence class or aristocratic approach to making historical notes, and, to a greater extent importantly, religious approach had been predominant in this sense over more than a thousand years the issues related to heresy and Inquisition contributed to gallant historiography, whereas the social protest against religious dogmas was an overall Western historiographic framework in the 18th -20th centur ies.Both approaches naturally distorted objective reality in an attempt to fit it into narrow Procrustean bed of socio policy-making context. Furthermore, it is important to keep in mind that the purpose of history hasnt been static over the societal developmental course it has altered a number of times from the impartial glorification of the certain rulers deeds to the formation of normal consciousness and stereotypes.Historians, as the members of society, naturally shared most stereotypes and social convictions , static writing purely for the sake of history. Nowadays, historical biases are closely knit to the issues, which arise in connection with social, gender and racial equality, so the modern media are concentrating on covering these issues and determining public opinion.Information therefore is presented is extremely available manner, which allows remembering the content of the article without any unneeded reflections or more profound analysis. The raw information (ne ws, editorials) has attractive cover, so the digestion and informational metabolism have been enhanced over the last century, whereas the description of events still remains biased in terms of the authors political and social position, or personal views.On the other hand, the freedom of printed war cry prohibits the misrepresentation of facts, yet the interpretation of certain data still whitethorn vary among journalists this principle is widely used to put the most inhibit and suitable emphases, thus except the provision of recent news, media are trustworthy for creating images, persuading public and imposing certain moral or ethical evaluation of the event or phenomenon (for more utility and convenience, from the position of right and damage).To sum up, it is impossible to eradicate historical biases historiography, like all descriptive and analytical sciences, follows relativist principles of minor or major truth. Nevertheless, with regard to high availableness of historic al writings, one has an opportunity to analyze the positions of several historiographic schools and draw more independent conclusions.