Nature vs Nurture Essay -- essays research papers

Nature or sustain?The Determination of Human BehaviourThe nature versus nurture debate has spanned oer decades, and is becoming moreheated in the recent years. Following the subprogram of the homo genome, scientists be pursuingthe possibility of controlling kind demeanor such as homicidal tendencies or insanity throughthe treatment of genes. Is this possible for us to ensure that clements be birth in plastered focussunder definite circumstances in future? This is passing doubtful, as the determination of human behaviour depends not only ongenes (nature), but also on the environment (nurture). It is usually the joint produce of genes andenvironment, one of the first principles in Leda Cosmides and John Tooby in evolutionaryPsychology Nature and Nurture (attached). This remains our groups thesis. launch request for example this Calvin and Hobbes strip. We assume that duplication is the same as clone and therefore the two Calvins aregenetically similar. Hobbes (that is t he tiger) implies in the last ashes that the two are similar inbehaviour. Ignoring the absurdity, it brings us to a interview Do genetically similar people discharge the same way? That is, can nature alone determine how one behaves?This seems quite impossible. Take another fictitious, but thought-provoking, example inMowgli, from The Jungle Book by Rudyard Kipling. He is genetically similar to all humanbeings and much less(prenominal) so to wolves, bears and panthers, but he behave more like the wildanimals. In this case, it is certainly clear that nature alone cannot determine human nature. Theenvironment makes a difference. Behaviour geneticsBehaviour genetics is the acquire of the extent to which heredity (genes) influence humanbehaviour. Genes are found in chromosomes which are made up of deoxyribonucleic acid(DNA). Our DNA strand determines not only our physical characteristics (known to soem as ourgenetic architecture) but also our mental make up. The human genome project hasisolated certain genes responsible for certain behaviour traits. For example dopamine isresponsible for risk-seeking behaviour, as well as hyperactivity (The Economist June 1st).Although the probability of altering genetic make-up and therefore human behaviour is... ...nbspThe effects of the environment also does not develop why some traits runs in the family.Charles Darwin, father of behaviour genetics, noted in 1872 that a gentleman had a habit ofraising his arm in expect of his face when sleeping and dropping it with a jerk hence contact hisnose (Darwin, C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals) This is an uncommontrait. However, years aft(prenominal) his death, his son and daughter are also found with the same trait. environment cannot give a suitable explanation for this trait. It also does not explain howidentical equalises who grow up apart can have the same behaviourism and why while biologicalchildren tend to behave like their parents whereas most adopt ed children do not. (As found bythe twin study and adopted study of University of Lousiana ) ConclusionTherefore, it can be cerebrate that neither nature and nurture is exclusively responsiblefor determining human behaviour. Although genes contribute to our physical characteristics(some of which affects our behaviour) and our psychological frame of mind, our experience andeducation are also important in determining who and what we are.