Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Kant - Essay ExampleIn addition, these laws are not only make by these beings, but these beings are also subject to the laws, which have been made. Every rational or kind nature is based on the autonomy of the beings, which is practiced by them. The categorical imperative is at the marrow of the philosophical concept as espo delectationd in the example philosophy of Kant and it may be used as a way of determining the motivations that bring about the actions of human beings. Kants view is that all human beings involve an unusual place in the creation, and this makes them immensely rational creatures that were given the ultimate commandment of precedent. Therefore, it is from this command of reason that all the duties and obligations that are observed by rational creatures are derived (McKinnon 844). Moreover, Kant defined an imperative as any suggestion that stated a certain activity or inactivity taken by a rational being to be necessary. A categorical imperative shows an impl icit requirement, which is independent that it affirms its authority in all situations that are required and justified as ends in themselves. In addition, Kant in his work verbalised the extreme dissatisfaction he felt with the chaste philosophy that was extremely popular in his time accept that this philosophy would never be able to surpass the level of hypothetical imperatives. A utilitarian in Kants time would have said that the murder was wrong because of the fact that it did not make exceed use of the good in those stack who were involved but that this was inappropriate for those people who were anxious with the maximization of the cheerful outcomes, which would come for themselves. Because of this, Kant argued that the morals systems that were based on the hypothetical could not persuade moral actions, or be regarded as the basis of moral arguments against others, this is because their imperatives were largely based on the subjective. Therefore, as an alternative Kant co nferred an option in a moralistic system that was based on the categorical imperative (OHagan 525). Kant like the utilitarians based his moral theory on the intrinsic value but this is the only similarities between these moral values. This is where utilitarianism takes happiness to be conceived as pleasure and the absence of pain to be an intrinsic value, moreover, Kant states that ones thinking that they have moral cost for its own sake is enough to be considered ones good will. In addition, he conceives people to be autonomous moral agents who have moral worth that is intrinsic and it is this, more than anything that makes them deserve moral respect. This hypothesis of Kant is sometimes thought of as the respect of persons theory of morality (Mina 24). harmonize to Kant, some objections to the moral theory have been there because of the fact that it is not always in the best interests of somebody to verbalise the truth. Sometimes, the truth is not always, what is needed and inst ead it can be extremely insalubrious to a person or those who are around him. For example, it would not be a persons best interests to tell a killer where his best friend is if this killer intends to kill his friend. Instead, this person has to lie to the killer to assure that the life of his best friend is saved and in the process, the moral theory as stated by Kant ceases to function. Kants moral theory is exceedingly limited to the telling of the truth, and it does not include those circumstances when the truth may not necessarily be a marvelous thing in the end. Still, the belief that one is