The Acts Of The Apostles A Book Report Religion Essay

The Acts Of The Apostles A nurse Report Religion EssayINTRODUCTIONIn this take report, I am going to write on the Acts of the Apostles written by, marshal I.H. I am as well as going what view point and character Marshall used to write on the Acts of the Apostles.THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLESIn this book, Marshall chip ins the Acts of the Apostles through the eyeball of Luke, who was travelling companion of the apostle Paul. Lukes desire in committal to piece of music the book of acts is to reach disclose a neat historical account of the events, that took specify in the early(a) church. Marshall, states that acts has been confirmed as a source to be depended on historically. heart and soul WITNESSThe book of acts, and the acts of the Apostles were written by an eye witness. Marshall, notes that from Acts 1610 onwards, Luke writes in the first person plural form. Marshall, mentions in his book, that Lukes mention of individuals, their positions in society, their tittles and surr ounding feel been proved to be true archaeologically.ACCURATE informationThere is a reference, in Acts 1212 of a ingathering meeting place in the house of Marks mother, it is assumed thats where the believers and the apostles met for prayer. Luke, also writes roughly the life of Paul, from Pauls position as a Pharisee to an apostle of Christ. Luke, in his writing would often give a good account of the events that were taking place in the lives of the apostles and because the information is so finished and has been proved to be true, Luke creation present to watch and learn from the Apostles. Therefore, Lukes writing proves that it was not imagination or fiction but true and significant. Marshall, notes that even Mark new a wad about the growth of the church and the council of capital of Israel, Mark also was a travelling companion of Paul. Since the writer of acts is Luke, who knew the disciples from their positions in society before they called to be apostle. When Luke intera cted with the apostles, he found out a lot of information about the apostles and their individual life stories. Luke, also mentioned the summonss and positions of different people presidential term Israel and the surrounding aras, people like Gallio who governed Greece. Luke also writes about Agabus, who prophesied about a great famine, that would take place all over the world and this prognostication was fulfilled during the reign of Claudius Caesar.COMMERCELukes writing, also shows that commerce was truly present in the days of the apostles. Acts1611-15 tells us of Paul and his companions, sharing to a womanhood by the name Lydia who was a purple merchant from the city of Thyatira. Lydias name is a reminder that Thyatira was located in the ancient kingdom of Lydia, a place that manufactured purple dyes.ANALYSISAny examination of the book of Acts is incomplete without some reference to Lukes original purpose for writing as recorded in Luke 11-4. Lukes first record, the Gospel of Luke, is actually the rattling preface to Acts as well as the Gospel itself. The first occasion that should be observed is that Luke does indeed claim to be writing an accurate historical account of the life of Christ in the preface to his Gospel, and in that respect is general agreement amongst scholars that Luke intends this statement to extend to his second volume. Carson, Moo and Morris have observed how some scholars say that those who claimed to be historians in ancient generation were well known for writing from their own biased agenda and therefore cannot be trusted to give an accurate historical account, but it should be noted that although it is true that some historians did write more fiction than fact, the trump out ancient writers were careful to give an accurate presentation of the facts in lots the same way that would be expected of modern historians. Luke deserves to be place amongst these ancient historians and only if differs from modern historians beca use he does not set out to present every historical detail but is deliberately selective, choosing to concentrate on only on events relevant to the growth of the Church. Like the Gospel, the second volume of Lukes history is dedicated to Theophilus who is addressed as most excellent 11-3. Bruce observes how it has been suggested that because the name Theophilus means dear to God, it is simply being used by Luke to refer to the Christian reader in general, and not to a specialised historical individual as such.10 However, Bruce continues to point out that this is unlikely for ii reasons. Firstly, the use of the title most excellent suggests an individual c.f. 2326 243 2625, and secondly, the literary style in which Luke writes his loyalty bears striking resemblance to other historical documents of antiquity.Those who regard the book of Acts as non-historical often point to the difficulties between the council of Jerusalem in Acts 151-29 and the writing of Paul in Galatians 21-10. 19 Although Lukes account of the council is straightforward, the main difficulty arises when it is compared with what appears to be the same event as described by Paul in Galatians.20 In Galatians Paul is speaking about his second visit to Jerusalem after his conversion, but in Acts Luke says that it was his third.21 This difficulty has long been recognised by biblical scholars and there are several explanations offered to resolve it.22 Bruce considers that the difficulties arise because the authors are actually speaking about two entirely different occasions. He arrives at this conclusion by observing how the discussion reported by Paul in Galatians differs from Acts because it centres around missionary activity the issue of circumcision is only marginally alluded to and no mention is made of appeasing table gild amongst Jews and Gentiles.23 Probably the most significant difference between the conference of Galatians 21-10 and council meeting in Acts 151-29 is that the former was held in private sequence the latter was held publicly, before the Jerusalem Church.24 Wainwright also agrees with Bruce in these differences and recognises a more consistent pattern with Galatians 21-10 in Acts 1127-30.25 polishIn my report of this book by Marshall I H, I agree to what the book says about the author of the book of acts that the author was Luke. I also agree to the fact that the information Luke gave about the lives and events surrounding the apostles is true and because he was a travelling companion of Paul, he knew a lot about the apostles from their position in society to their positions in the church.